Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News. According to a letter later written by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, the “peak activity triggering the comment system’s unavailability” began on May 7, at around 11pm ET. Added Title Size RTS S L DL Subcat; : Fearless S01E04 (896x504p) torrent: 491.31 MB ---Other: : Preacher S02.E02 Download the free trial version below to get started. Double-click the downloaded file to install the software. No-registration upload of files up to 250MB. Not available in some countries. On Tuesday, Baltimore news outlets shared footage from a January drug bust where an officer appeared to record himself planting drugs he would later say belonged to a.
The FCC Is Full of Shit. On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission fired back against negative coverage of its response to a public records request filed by Gizmodo in May. The FCC website faced a barrage of traffic on May 8 after comedian John Oliver, host of HBO’s Last Week Tonight, asked his viewers to submit comments to the agency in support of Obama- era rules enforcing net neutrality. The regulations make it illegal for ISPs to block or slow traffic to certain websites and services.
In his statement, Hart blasted what he called “inaccurate” and “misleading reports” about the alleged cyberattack. On Wednesday, Gizmodo reported the agency’s refusal to release more than 2. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Further, the FCC stated that it had no records related to an analysis being performed on its systems during the attack, seemingly contradicting previous remarks from one of its staff the following day. Despite Hart’s statement Thursday, Gizmodo’s report did not claim that the FCC “lacks written documentation” of the attack—only that the FCC had stated, in writing, that it held no records of any kind related to the so- called “analysis” cited by its official in the immediate aftermath of the incident. According to a letter later written by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, the “peak activity triggering the comment system’s unavailability” began on May 7, at around 1.
ET. On May 8, at about 2pm, the agency published a statement in which Chief Information Officer Dr. David Bray said, “Beginning on Sunday night at midnight, our analysis reveals that the FCC was subject to multiple distributed denial- of- service attacks (DDo.
Cam Studio V2 7 Full Cracked Antivirus For 2016
Hierarchical HTML Sitemap For PirateCity.NET. Hi, I’m looking for some specialty software and I’m having no luck I work for a shop that does ECU tuning on. How To Avoid Game Of Thrones Spoilers For, Oh, The Next Year. The entire plot of Game of Thrones Season 7 may have already leaked, and it’s not expected to. You have not yet voted on this site! If you have already visited the site, please help us classify the good from the bad by voting on this site.
S).” (Emphasis ours)On May 2. Gizmodo filed its FOIA request, a section of which sought out copies of “any records related to the FCC . Bray’s statement) that concluded a DDo. S attack had taken place.” In a letter on Wednesday, the agency responded: “IT staff have confirmed there are no records responsive to this portion of the request. The analysis referred to stemmed from real time observation and feedback by Commission IT staff and did not result in written documentation.”Taken at its word, the FCC’s statement means that for a period of about 1. IT department wrote a single email or memo, nor did they take down any notes of any kind about the cyberattack that, according to Chairman Pai, caused a malicious 3.
Bray, however; citing the federal law, it had asked the agency to turn over any records even “related to” the analysis of which Bray spoke. In its statement on Thursday, FCC spokesman Brian Hart said, “Given that the Commission’s IT professionals were in the midst of addressing the attack on May 8, that analysis was not reduced to writing.
However, subsequent analysis, once the incident had concluded, was put in writing.” Presumably, this “subsequent analysis” is in someway “related to” information that the agency’s employees would have gleaned while being otherwise too engrossed in cyberwarfare to jot anything down. Prior to the statement by FCC’s Hart on Thursday afternoon, Senator Ron Wyden had stated in an email that the agency’s response to Gizmodo’s FOIA request raised “legitimate questions about whether the agency is being truthful when it claims a DDo.
S attack knocked its commenting system offline.” The Oregon senator said it was critical that the agency produce evidence of the attack, if only so independent experts could verify and learn something from it. He continued: “If the FCC did suffer a DDo. S attack and yet created no written materials about it, that would be deeply irresponsible and cast doubt on how the FCC could possibly prevent future attacks. On the other hand, if FCC is playing word games to avoid responding to FOIA requests, it would clearly violate Chairman Ajit Pai’s pledge to increase transparency at the FCC.”So as not to mislead or confuse the FCC, Gizmodo elaborated at some length about what it meant when it said it was requesting “records” related to the attack: “Gizmodo seeks all responsive records regardless of format, medium, or physical characteristics. In conducting your search, please understand the terms . We seek records of any kind, including electronic records, audiotapes, videotapes, and photographs, as well as letters, emails, facsimiles, telephone messages, voice mail messages and transcripts, notes, or minutes of any meetings, telephone conversations or discussions.
Our request includes any attachments to these records. No category of material should be omitted from search, collection, and production.”What’s more, the records related to Bray’s so- called “analysis” were only one of six categories of material sought. The request further included any agency emails referencing “DDo. S,” “astroturfing,” “spam,” and “net neutrality,” in addition to any related calendar entries, visitor logs, meeting minutes, orders, memoranda, or written views concerning the FCC’s comment system. Also requested were all records related to a May 9th letter authored by Senators Wyden and Brian Schatz regarding the attack. Yet, somehow the FCC could not produce a single document from the day the cyberattack is said to have occurred. It released one email from a reporter asking for a comment about Schatz and Wyden’s letter.
Another short one concerning the same letter between two FCC staffers was entirely redacted, because its disclosure would, the agency said, expose its “decision making process in such a way as to discourage candid discussion within the agency and thereby undermine the agency’s ability to perform its functions.” (The FCC believes that the public would react poorly if details emerged about how it planned to respond to the senator’s questions.)The FCC’s refusal to produce records of any true relevance reflects pressure from the agency’s upper echelon to limit the disclosure of information about the incident to a handful of public statements. Its justifications for concealing more than 2. FOIA records run the gamut of the federal statute’s permitted exemptions: many of the documents are said to contain either “trade secrets” or “privileged and confidential” information. Others were withheld because doing otherwise, the FCC asserted, might reveal “discussion of the Commission’s IT infrastructure and countermeasures.” Although the law requires the agency’s attorneys to review each document individually, and only redact the portions of the text that truly deserve to be withheld, more than 9.
It would be hard for a government agency to do more to give off the impression that it was engaged in a cover up. That’s troubling given the rise of questions over the FCC’s integrity. In fact, reports emerging in the wake of the cyberattack suggest that the FCC public comment system is already wholly compromised. Spambots are said to have inundated the website with fake letters, according to multiple sources.
Hundreds of thousands of identical messages can be viewed there—some containing the names and addresses of Americans who, when contacted by reporters, have claimed that their identities must’ve been stolen. Even opponents of net neutrality, who enjoy the support of Chairman Pai, admit that the system is “unmanageable and meaningless.”Earlier this month, one conservative group claimed that hundreds of thousands of recent comments were all submitted using the same address in Russia. When approached by reporters and asked if the FCC intends to filter out the slew of blatantly counterfeit comments—many reportedly penned by the likes of “Wonder Woman” and “Joseph Stalin”—both Chairman Pai and his spokesperson tellingly refused to provide an answer straight up.
Americans hoping to have an impact on the net neutrality debate might be better off tossing their comments down the nearest wishing well. Yet, this week the FCC rejected a separate public records request filed by the National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC), which sought the text of more than 4. Americans against internet service providers for potentially violating net neutrality rules. NHMC has argued that the complaints may be crucial to understanding what effect rolling back net neutrality may have on consumers.
The FCC, which has argued that the request is “unreasonably burdensome” on its staff, agreed to release 1,0. It should give the public pause,” the group said, “that the agency with exclusive control over regulating internet service providers refuses to share such information with the public.”On Tuesday, the Trump White House formally endorsed Pai’s plans to rollback net neutrality, which critics say will result in internet providers like Verizon and Comcast curtailing their customers’ access to certain websites and services—concerns which Pai has openly criticized as “hysterical prophecies of doom.”Regardless, those are the genuine fears of some of the internet’s biggest companies, all steadfast supporters of net neutrality—Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, and many others among them.
Baltimore Cop Plays Himself by Seemingly Planting Drugs in Front of Body Cam . The video, posted by Baltimore Sun reporter Justin Fenton, is staggering: While on, Axon body cameras enter “buffering” mode, allowing them to save up to 3. Presumably unaware of this feature, the unidentified officer recorded his serendipitous discovery of a baggie full of pills after also capturing footage of himself putting them there in the first place. When the video begins, the officer drops a baggie of pills into a soup can in a lot covered in garbage.
Then, the officer goes out to the street and activates his camera. To him, this is the beginning of the video. Audio comes in and one of the cops says, “we can go check here.” Moments later, the officer walks back to the soup can (how did he know where to look?) and “discovers” the drugs, shouting out “Yo!” to alert the accompanying officers. Both of whom, of course, were standing right next to him when the drugs were placed in the lot. Charges were eventually dropped against the suspect, though Baltimore police haven’t commented on what actions are being taken against the officers present, only confirming an investigation has been launched. According to. Fox 4.
News, the officer served as a key witness in an unrelated trial just days after the revelation: In an email, the prosecutor says: ”I’ve passed it up and we are all appalled . The felony case against the driver was later dismissed.
Although civil rights groups initially called for the widespread adoption of body cameras by police departments, those sentiments have cooled as officials have impeded the public’s access to such footage and numerous officers have been found innocent despite damning video evidence. Update 4: 3. 0 PM EST: In a press conference Wednesday, Baltimore PD confirmed they have suspended the officer implicated in the footage pending an investigation. The other two officers in the footage have been placed on “non- public contact” duty, also pending an investigation.